The People’s Democratic Party, PDP, has appointed Kabiru Turaki as the chairman of the interim national working committee, NWC.
Turaki was appointed to lead the 13-member interim NWC on Monday at the party’s 103rd national executive committee, NEC, meeting in Abuja.
Other members of the committee are Woyengikuro Daniel, Hamza Koshe, Ihediwa Nnabugwu, Isa Abubakar, Okechukwu Daniel, Theophilus Shan, Ini Ememobong, Aribisala Idowu, Bara’u Shafi’i, Ogbu Chinenyenwa, Umar Aji, and Arapaja Taofeek, secretary.
On Thursday, Adolphus Wabara, chairman of the PDP BoT, announced that the BoT has assumed leadership of the party following the supreme court’s ruling invalidating the national convention held on November 15 and 16, 2025.
Also Read: Atiku, Makinde, Turaki, others hold close-door meeting
The convention elected Turaki as the party’s national chairman.
In a split judgement delivered on April 30, three out of five justices of the apex court held that the appeal filed by the Turaki-led faction to validate the convention lacks merit.
Stephen Adah, who read the majority decision, held that the appellants violated a subsisting order of the federal high court, which restrained them from proceeding with the planned convention.
The appeal marked SC/CV/164/2026 stems from a decision of Peter Lifu, judge of a federal high court in Abuja, who issued a temporary order on November 11, restraining the party from proceeding with the planned convention pending the determination of a substantive suit filed by Sule Lamido, former governor of Jigawa state.
On November 14, he made a final order restraining the PDP from conducting its national convention.
In his judgment, Lifu held that the evidence before the court established that Lamido was “unjustly denied” the opportunity to obtain a nomination form to contest the position of national chairman of the party, in violation of the PDP constitution and its internal regulations.
The decision was later upheld by the court of appeal on March 9. Aggrieved, the PDP faction further appealed the appellate court’s decision.
In the majority judgment, Adah held that the appellants went ahead in “flagrant disregard” of the subsisting order of the federal high court.
The apex court held that, instead of abiding by the lower court’s order or appealing it immediately, the PDP abused the court process by filing a similar case before another court of coordinate jurisdiction.
The court also noted that the appellants in their appeal did not challenge the findings of the court of appeal that criticised the party for disobeying a subsisting court order.
Consequently, Adah upheld the appellate court’s verdict and dismissed the appeal.
THE CABLE NEWS
