In a move reviving age-old constitutional concerns, President Donald Trump is drawing intense scrutiny over his reported intent to accept a $400 million Boeing 747 from the royal family of Qatar.
The aircraft, proposed for temporary use as Air Force One before being transferred to Trump’s presidential library, has sparked legal and ethical alarms.
Historically, U.S. presidents have been barred from accepting foreign gifts without congressional approval. In 1839, President Martin Van Buren deferred to Congress when gifted two live lions by the Sultan of Morocco and later rejected horses and pearls from Oman, in accordance with the U.S. Constitution’s Emoluments Clause.
Trump, however, appears to dismiss such historical restraint. “I could be a stupid person and say, ‘Oh, no, we don’t want a free plane,’” he told reporters, suggesting that the U.S. often gives freely and should be able to accept gifts as well.
White House officials confirmed the legal process is ongoing. Qatar, for its part, has stated no final decision has been made. Still, the mere proposal has reignited constitutional debates and sparked bipartisan backlash.
Legal experts emphasize that accepting such a gift without congressional consent would directly violate the Constitution. The Emoluments Clause clearly prohibits presidents from receiving presents or payments from foreign powers unless Congress explicitly approves.
Although Trump has previously defied constitutional norms, including benefiting from Supreme Court decisions that expanded presidential immunity, ethics scholars warn this case is unprecedented in scale and risk.
READ ALSO: Trump plans major cuts in drug prices
“This intermingling of Trump’s presidency and personal business interests sets a dangerous precedent,” said Jessica Tillipman, a law professor at George Washington University. She noted that past presidents divested or placed assets in blind trusts to avoid even the perception of impropriety.
Trump’s business empire, now managed by his son Eric, is aggressively expanding in the Middle East, including Trump-branded real estate in Saudi Arabia, a new golf course in Qatar, and UAE crypto deals reportedly worth billions. Accepting the jet while these ventures continue raises sharp concerns over potential foreign influence.
Beyond ethics and legality, national security experts argue that the idea of converting a used foreign aircraft into Air Force One is deeply problematic. Garrett Graff, a presidential historian, pointed out that the plane would need to be stripped “down to the studs” to even begin to meet U.S. intelligence and security standards.
“It is inconceivable that the Secret Service would approve the president flying on a plane previously controlled by a foreign government,” Graff wrote. “It’s a counterintelligence and cybersecurity nightmare.”
Even the current Air Force One replacements, initiated during Trump’s first term, have faced delays and budget overruns due to the intense security requirements. Those aircraft are still years from delivery, with Boeing billions over budget and behind schedule.
The proposed Qatari jet gift has drawn rebuke from both Democrats and Republicans.
“I think America can afford their own plane and build their own Air Force One,” said former GOP House Speaker Kevin McCarthy.
Rep. Dan Goldman (D-NY) went further, calling the plan “a reflection of an egregious, corrupt presidency” and warned that any president must act solely in America’s interest — not under the shadow of foreign generosity.
The U.S. Commerce Department, ironically, has just launched a national security review into the import of aircraft and parts — adding another layer of awkwardness to Trump’s “America First” posture while seeking foreign gifts.
As Trump embarks on a Middle East trip, observers worry whether other nations may follow Qatar’s example in attempting to win favor. If the $400 million jet is any indication, the bidding to curry favor with the U.S. president may have just begun.
CNN
