Presidential spokesman, Mr Bayo Onanuga has responded firmly to recent remarks by African Development Bank, AfDB, President, Dr. Akinwumi Adesina, who asserted that Nigerians are worse off today than they were at independence in 1960.
The statement, made during Adesina’s keynote address at the “Distinguished Lecture Series” organized by the Nigerian Institute of International Affairs, has sparked widespread reactions and debate across social and political circles.
Adesina had lamented Nigeria’s persistent struggles with poverty, unemployment, and insecurity, emphasizing that “despite the vast resources and potential the country possesses, a significant portion of the population continues to live in multidimensional poverty.”
He argued that in 1960, although Nigeria faced colonial legacies and limited infrastructure, there was greater optimism, stronger institutions, and a more equitable society.
He also noted the sharp decline in access to quality education, healthcare, and safety, describing them as critical benchmarks of national well-being.
“Today, we see increasing youth unemployment, rising debt levels, and growing insecurity that undermines the gains we hoped to achieve post-independence,” Adesina said.
READ ALSO: Tinubu to swear in new ministers Monday, says Onanuga
He further warned that without structural reforms and visionary leadership, Nigeria’s economic and social trajectory could worsen.
But Onanuga has dismissed the assessment as misleading and historically inaccurate. He emphasized that while the country continues to face significant challenges, it has also recorded undeniable advancements over the decades.
“Such comparisons oversimplify history and ignore the significant strides Nigeria has taken in infrastructure, education, technology, and democratic development since 1960,” Onanuga stated.
The presidency highlighted recent policy measures, including ongoing economic reforms, energy sector revamps, and youth empowerment initiatives, as evidence of progress.
Onanuga also cautioned against what he described as “demoralizing rhetoric” from influential figures, especially during a period of policy transition and recovery.
“It’s important for respected voices to inspire hope, not despair,” he added.
Crediblenewsng.com
